Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Take a second and think about two things. Please!
One.
You would rather have a Lexus or justice
A dream or some substance
A Beamer, a necklace or freedom
Two.
White Privilege.
I will post more on this later. But seriously, the second one, think about it really hard (I'm willing to bet you don't think about it often).
I Hate To Say...
The second article I found interesting was titled Saving Citi May Create More Fear. In economics there is a thing called moral hazard. In non-economics terms moral hazard is when a party is protected from risk, they will then become riskier than they would have been had they not been protected. It applies to such things as insurance, finance, and even possibly people who wear seatbelts (we won't get into that though). In the article they have the sentence
"But longer term, the new bailout could haunt regulators and taxpayers. The move ultimately may encourage banks to take more risks in the belief that the government will step in if they run into trouble."Sounds to me like the definition of moral hazard. What do I propose to do? Someone write this into congress for me, cause it is one of the more decent ideas I have had.
The banks know who is defaulting on their loans. And the government is giving money to the banks to make them able to absorb the fact that these people won't pay the banks back. The government should give money to the people who are defaulting and give them the choice of a bank to switch their mortgage to. This way the people will pay their loans back, and to banks who are willing to restructure and give proper incentive (like not making more risky loans). This will allow the banks that are the best to flourish and the banks that we are bailing out to disappear. People will maintain their assets and not be forced into foreclosure or bankruptcy. For the future, banks will know that they cannot be risky and get bailed out, they will know that the consumer cares about smart banking policy and money security and that they have to make the right decision to stay in business (like most other business). Banks are here to serve the people, as is government, when the banks don't serve the people the government shouldn't serve the banks (who by the way are taking in tons of capital from Big Brother and not making as many loans as they should be). ...think about it.
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Two Tounges...
I know I'm crazy to even compare the two but anything that Chris is involved with will always draw that comparison for me and the answer will always be the same. Through Being Cool is just too great of a record.
Real Life Comedy
But honestly, society has built up the relationship and it's importance so much so that it controls peoples thoughts, emotions, actions, even lives. There are a few different types of people when it comes to relationships that I have been able to pick out.
- The settler. This is someone who wants to be in a relationship so bad that they will take anyone who will take them
- The gold digger. Everyone knows what this one is, what people don't know is that it isn't just about the money. The gold digger can be someone who is in it for anything other than emotion, ie fame, friends, name dropping abilities (watch those toes), arm candy.
- The faker. This person doesn't want to be in a relationship at all, they don't want to do any of the work that a relationship requires, but they are in one anyway. Who knows why?
- The serial monogamist. Is in a relationship because it is all they know. Can often be a settler as well.
- The user. Related to the gold digger but is only interested in the sexual aspect of the relationship.
- The hopeless romantic. Thanks a lot The Notebook, Clueless, Sweet Home Alabama, and every other chick flick that has both genders falling in and out of love with "the one" every time they meet someone new.
- The lonely hearts cluber. This person is in a relationship because they have no friends and need something/someone to make them feel okay about being an introvert. Ironically this is a symptom that can develop (and often does) once in a relationship exclusively associating with the significant other in favor of a more balanced existence.
- The poser. A lot like the faker but you can tell why they are in the relationship, because relationships are cool, duh! It's like shoes or Daft Punk to them.
- The cheap trick. Because they want you want them. They need you to need them. They love you to love them.
Monday, November 17, 2008
Don't let this win over you
First Youtube embed on the blog!
POSI
Sunday, November 16, 2008
Converge is it.
- Sonically they have a sound that is truly unique. To music listeners who are unfamiliar with a harder and darker tone to music, I can see how Converge could be lumped in with all the other "hard" bands. However, to people to enjoy screaming and a harder edge in music Converge has a sound that is so unique and progressive that they stand as kings.
- Visually this band is everything that is right with the music industry. Jake Bannon, the vocalist, does all of the art for the band. He is a professor of art when not touring with Converge or other projects. The artwork for the Jane Doe album is a common tattoo for Converge fans, and his style is so distinct that liner art and other albums work also gets chosen for tattoos and is easily noticeable. The music video for Eagles Will Become Vultures (the best of their videos) is perhaps one of the most perfect pieces of film ever, and hardly anyone has seen it. If you do not appreciate loud, hard, screamy music I understand, but please check out the artwork for this band, it is without question amazing. The fact that the band devotes so much of itself to the artwork and imagery surround the project speaks volumes as to the complete package of true art that Converge is, and other bands are not.
- Lyrically Converge is like a rainbow during a hurricane. The music is super dissonant however the lyrics are extremely positive, cohesive, and beautifully crafted. This is what draws me to this band and I could write pages about their lyrics so I will just say this, lyrically Converge has the enviable ability to say so much with so little, succinct and powerful are the best adjectives that come to mind.
- Ethically empowered. Converge might as well be spelled DIY. Jake Bannon is co-founder and operator of Deathwish Inc., a record label devoted to counter-culture progression and alternative music. Kurt Ballou, guitarist, owns and operates GodCity Studios where the band records, the bands other projects record, and many other band go to have their music made into art. They do their own art, stand for many social causes, and only partner with companies of integrity, among many other traits that make them better than most other bands. Their lyrics, music, and actions are all in synch to make them ethically one of the most righteous bands ever.
- History. Converge has been around for nearly 20 years. Never changing who they are or what they stand for to "bust into the mainstream." Converge will most likely never have their video played on MTV unless at 2am, they will never be featured in a TV show unless as unknown background music, they will not likely reach mainstream radio play or sell out concerts at major arenas. Because of who they are and what they do this is their fate, and something tells me they would have it no other way. In the 20 years they have been around they have released 7 full lengths, a bakers dozen or so of EPs/Demos/Vinyl/Splits, 1 DVD, and been apart of other musical projects such as Doomriders, Old Man Gloom, Bane, Supermachiner, Cave In, and various other bands and solo projects. They are constantly contributing their art to the world.
Proof in the pudding (phone)
(this is just one example, it really does apply to just about everything in life)
Saturday, November 15, 2008
The Only True Fortune Cookie I've Seen
Monday, November 10, 2008
Who is that guy anyway?
Friday night I went to go see Saosin, my favorite band, perform at the Filmore in Denver. And when I say I went to see them perform it is because they play their music flawlessly while being extremely entertaining. While this time around wasn't their best it is still better than many and most other bands around. While at the show I had the opportunity to see The Devil Wears Prada and Underoath as well. First time seeing TDWP while I've seen Underoath a half dozen times, or so. It was seeing these two bands in combination that made me realize I had to make this plea:
FIRE THE SYNTH PLAYER!
That's right, the band member that plays around on that Casio or Korg has got to go. Don't mistake this for me saying I don't want the synth in the music, without it I think both those bands (and many others) would not be as cohesive. Bands like Enter Shikari, Underoath, The Devil Wear Prada, and other have a presence on CD that is amplified by the differentiation in tone that the synth offers compared to the rest of the instrumentation. Formulaic bands with guitars, bass, and a drummer can be transformed into something more exciting with a synth. However, the live show has never and will never benefit from the chubby band mate that presses a key or two every 2 minutes. The band is better off with an iPOD and the extra cash in their pockets at the end of the night. Allow me for a moment to describe the stage presence of the synth player and then perhaps you will agree with my plea.
As the band walks out onto the stage (probably dimly lit) he is the one with both hands raised high in the air begging the crowd to praise him. He walks up to his rig (because he has multiple keyboards and a laptop out it is officially a rig) and presses a key on the Korg, doesn't matter what key since it is programmed to play once any key it pressed. He scrolls the laptop pad and makes a few clicks on the laptop but there is no real change in the sound, still the Korg plays on. Then the rest of the band begins to play and the synth player takes two minutes to frantically headband out of rhythm and shake his arms around about his head. Finally he presses another key and goes on to rock out again. For the bands not big enough to have the laptop yet fear not he is have a break from rocking out so hard by being the dude to grab a water bottle and throw it on the crowd, that's always sure to entrance the moshing 16 year olds. Finally as the show is coming to an end he is the one to press his last key on the rig and head off stage, a full 3 minutes before the song is even over.
To the bands, if you have any sense of showmanship left in you please heed my plea and FIRE THE SYNTH PLAYER!
Sunday, November 9, 2008
TOYS!

Which is incredible seeing as how the toy started as something like this:
I ended up purchasing a sibling set that was designed by a design firm in Australia called TOKO, here are the toys:
And I love them. I love them so much so that I made them little houses to hangout it on my wall. Not a ton of effort was put into the homes, or the picture taking but you can have a peak below. I figured building them a display was the least I could do since they had another sibling that was killed by a laser! Its a long but totally true story that is too heart wrenching to tell on a blog. The homes:


Tuesday, November 4, 2008
Voting, is it pointless, altrusitic, or something else?
Here is one of my favorite economists, Tyler Cowen, on voting:
Most of what you do is for expressive value anyway, so you shouldn't feel guilty about voting, if indeed you vote. The people who think they are being instrumentally rational by not voting are probably deceiving themselves more. They are actually engaged in an even less transparent form of expressive behavior (protest against the voting system) and yet cloaking that behavior under the guise of instrumental rationality. The best arguments against voting are simply if you either don't like voting or if you don't know which candidate is better. High-status people hardly ever offer the latter justification, even though the split of opinions among high-status people suggests that not all high-status people can in fact know which candidate is better.
In other words, both voting and not voting are motivated by the thought that you are better than other people. I am glad that we have an entire day devoted to this very important concept.
And here is an abstract of a paper by Julio Rotemberg on voting altruism:
This paper presents a goal-oriented model of political participation based on two psychological assumptions. The first is that people are more altruistic towards individuals that agree with them and the second is that people's well-being rises when other people share their personal opinions. The act of voting is then a source of vicarious utility because it raises the well-being of individuals that agree with the voter. Substantial equilibrium turnout emerges with nontrivial voting costs and modest altruism. The model can explain higher turnout in close elections as well as votes for third-party candidates with no prospect of victory. For certain parameters, these third party candidates lose votes to more popular candidates, a phenomenon often called strategic voting. For other parameters, the model predicts "vote-stealing" where the addition of a third candidate robs a viable major candidate of electoral support.Here is the paper.
Here is another article on the altruistic nature of voting.
Are people really this altruistic? And if so what is their behavior like the other 364 days of the year? When going to the polls think about this and if you are that altruistic maybe it is time you act like it in other ways as well.
Monday, November 3, 2008
Saturday, November 1, 2008
Concerts
On Thursday I went and saw The Faint, still one of the most crisp sounding bands in a live setting. They can replicate the sounds, tones, rhythm, and feel that is on their CD, but with a few hundred other folks to dance with.
Last night, Halloween, I went to a house show and it brought me back to booking house shows and warehouse shows for my friends bands. I remember making connections around town and meeting all kinds of people who felt the same way I did, DIY!
Tonight I prepare to go to see my friends performing once again, although this time it is a little different. They are playing at a legitimate venue and have support from large companies to make their music their lives.
It is interesting to me that after all the years of being around and working hard and standing for something, that I may have moved out of music being my life. And other people I know have moved into it. I would not change anything that has happened and love my life and where things have taken me. I love that my friends are successful at what they are doing and even if it wasn't music, I want them to do well. I guess I am just being nostalgic for the years when music reigned. Also, I'm super excited to revert back to my 16 year old ways since I feel more like a 46 year old these days.